Margus Voll August 13, 2018 Share August 13, 2018 Wrote a little thing about color workflow that seems confusing to many. Hope it helps to clear it up a bit. http://www.iconstudios.eu/workflow/aces-the-mighty-beast-of-colors/ 4 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Adam Fiori August 25, 2018 Share August 25, 2018 Thanks for posting this! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Morgana McKenzie September 11, 2020 Share September 11, 2020 Great blog post! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Christian Berg-Nielsen September 14, 2020 Share September 14, 2020 Great post indeed!One question. Is ACEScc the most common working colour space? I’m using ACEScct and thought this was the most common. For me the blacks and lift operations feels much nicer in ACEScct Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Orash Rahnema September 15, 2020 Share September 15, 2020 @Christian Berg-Nielsen ACEScc and cct are the same, where the only difference is that cct has a "toe", so the blacks are a little lifted with a very small "soft clip" this has been done because any other flavour of ACES otherwise tend to keep whatever is at 0 level untouched giving a sticky feeling in the blacks that most of the time are a pain to deal with So most of the user that don't have access different drt gravitates toward ACEScct but it's not mandatory, using ACEScc ensure you that whatever is at 0 stays at 0, so if ones grading stile has always pure blacks then this might help as one will end up pushing the whole signal to accomodate those sticky blacks that i was mentioning before Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Margus Voll September 18, 2020 Author Share September 18, 2020 I would also go as far and say that the tools behavior changes are marginal but getting errors due negative values in shadows is more of a reason to use cct.Maybe resolve and some other tools could address that so going under 0 value does not result in negative (pink and blue pixel noise) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anton Meleshkevich September 27, 2020 Share September 27, 2020 On 9/14/2020 at 6:19 PM, Christian Berg-Nielsen said: Is ACEScc the most common working colour space? Netflix recommends using ACEScct instead of ACEScc. I like the idea of a real logarithmic transfer curve of ACEScc, but unfortunately it has noticeable artifacts in the shadows. It's less noticeable with Alexa, but I often get bright pixels in the shadows with Red cameras as Margus mentioned. So I stick with ACEScct. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.