Jump to content
Lowepost

Eizo cg2730 vs cg279x


Nicolas Hanson

Recommended Posts

I wonder if I can save some cash by going for Eizo cg2730 instead of Eizo cg279x.

I hope to be able to trust the internal calibration, but I understand it relies on calibration with a 1D LUT only. So for 100% accuracy I would probably need external calibration with a 3D LUT that cg379x has built in. I have also picked up that I don't need the built in 3D LUT capability that comes with cg279x  if I add an external 3D LUT box (which I dont want to do) or output a 3D LUT from Resolve. 

So my question will be; what is the process of outputting a 3D LUT from Resolve when used for calibration? Is this a process done when calibrating only? If it's just a matter of doing a simple process in Resolve each time I want to calibrate, then I would probably go for the cg2730 and save some money.


 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...